From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19687 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2002 13:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19604 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2002 13:59:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web13206.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.174.191) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2002 13:59:06 -0000 Message-ID: <20020226135905.66957.qmail@web13206.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.215.160.34] by web13206.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 05:59:05 PST Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:07:00 -0000 From: Danish Samad Subject: rtl dependency To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, raufh@enabtech.com, durdana@enabtech.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg01574.txt.bz2 hello, I have observed that different cross compilers produce different RTL for the same peice of code. Does this mean that unoptimized RTL generated is dependent on target description macros if yes then which macros? or is it only dependent on machine descriptions? Further what would I have to do to produce load store RTL instructions for a initialization such as i=4; thanking in advance, danish __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com