From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17169 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2002 06:40:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17076 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2002 06:40:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sparky.j-son.org) (213.64.99.137) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2002 06:40:12 -0000 Received: from chj by sparky.j-son.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16gK7x-0000Z2-00 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 07:33:17 +0100 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 23:29:00 -0000 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Question for successful Cygwin/gcc builders Message-ID: <20020228063313.GA1807@j-son.org> Mail-Followup-To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20020228033640.1D4DAF28CD@nile.gnat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Christian_J=F6nsson?= X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg01776.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:56:58PM -0600, Dockeen wrote: > In your post you hit the key words. It is tricky. hmm, i've built and tested for a long time on cygwin/win2k, no problem AFAIK, not even tricky :-) are you saying nt4 is quite different than win2k? > ./configure *couple of simple options* uhm, we do out of tree boostraps, right? Cheers, /ChJ (off to work now)