From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25423 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2002 07:10:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25382 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2002 07:10:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2002 07:10:08 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3776uY26232; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 03:06:56 -0400 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com ([172.16.24.7]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g377A5m06837; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 03:10:05 -0400 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3779ip01058; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 23:09:44 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 23:38:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Mark Mitchell Cc: Jason Merrill , Diego Novillo , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , "gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: PR c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz Message-ID: <20020406230944.A1055@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Mark Mitchell , Jason Merrill , Diego Novillo , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , "gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" References: <50920000.1018133334@gandalf.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <50920000.1018133334@gandalf.codesourcery.com>; from mark@codesourcery.com on Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:48:54PM -0800 X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00239.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:48:54PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > I think this is the most practical solution under the circumstances. Hold off a bit. I don't think either of the solutions that Jason suggests are hard to implement. I'd certainly prefer a solution that doesn't re-introduce bugs... r~