From: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Release
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020410101439.A1707@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48730000.1017786180@gandalf.codesourcery.com>; from mark@codesourcery.com on Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:23:00PM -0800
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:23:00PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Now that Richard has made GNATS immune to random new bugs being classified
> as "high" priority, it makes sense to go back to using high-priority bugs
> in GNATS -- rather than an external issuse list -- as our way to measure
> what needs to be done before the release.
>
> To that end, I've made sure that everything on the issues list is marked
> "high" in GNATS, and checked in a new copy of the issues list that
> indicates it is no longer in use.
What's the right way to ask for bugs to be high priority?
PR optimization/6177 (ia64 ICE with single-element complex array in
LAPACK) describes a bug introduced on April 2. It affects i686 also.
An update to the PR includes a six line Fortran test case.
Janis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-10 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-02 14:38 Mark Mitchell
2002-04-02 14:47 ` Tom Tromey
2002-04-03 15:06 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-03 16:08 ` Joe Buck
2002-04-03 17:57 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-04 10:17 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-09 9:48 ` Joe Buck
2002-04-09 10:44 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2002-04-09 11:35 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-10 2:37 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-10 7:59 ` Joe Buck
2002-04-10 8:17 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-10 8:22 ` Joe Buck
2002-04-10 10:14 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-10 11:39 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2002-04-10 11:47 ` Paolo Carlini
[not found] ` <flwuvfqrme.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
2002-04-12 5:12 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-04-10 13:01 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-11 6:02 ` Joe Buck
2002-04-11 14:58 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-10 15:44 ` Fixing libstdc++/3628 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Paolo Carlini
2002-04-10 15:49 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-10 17:29 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-04-12 16:10 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-12 18:20 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-04-15 17:51 ` GCC 3.1 Release Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-15 19:36 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-15 19:43 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 20:03 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-16 9:49 ` rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Joe Buck
2002-04-16 10:04 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-16 10:35 ` Joe Buck
2002-04-16 10:53 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-16 11:05 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-16 10:49 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-17 11:56 ` Richard B. Kreckel
2002-04-17 12:15 ` Joe Buck
2002-04-19 12:54 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-17 12:16 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-17 16:54 ` Joe Buck
2002-04-19 13:19 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-19 15:05 ` Joe Buck
2002-04-19 12:59 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-19 14:34 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-19 12:47 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-06 7:47 ` GCC 3.1 Release Jason Merrill
2002-04-10 10:17 ` Janis Johnson [this message]
2002-04-10 10:24 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-10 10:35 ` Christian Jönsson
2002-04-03 2:38 Reichelt
2002-04-03 13:21 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-03 23:20 John David Anglin
2002-04-12 18:51 Mark Mitchell
2002-04-13 2:21 ` Neil Booth
2002-04-13 7:50 ` Toon Moene
2002-04-13 8:40 ` Tim Prince
2002-04-13 23:07 ` Bryce McKinlay
2002-04-14 17:04 ` David Edelsohn
2002-04-15 17:19 ` David O'Brien
2002-04-15 18:02 ` David Edelsohn
2002-04-16 17:06 ` Marc Espie
2002-04-22 19:44 ` David O'Brien
2002-04-22 20:11 ` Bryce McKinlay
2002-04-23 11:04 ` David O'Brien
2002-04-23 16:15 ` Bryce McKinlay
2002-04-22 22:25 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-04-14 1:33 ` H . J . Lu
2002-04-16 17:00 ` Marc Espie
2002-04-17 2:08 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2002-05-17 5:42 ` Marc Espie
2002-05-17 16:19 ` Loren James Rittle
2002-05-17 17:07 ` David O'Brien
2002-05-17 17:08 ` Marc Espie
2002-04-13 13:18 ` Tom Tromey
2002-04-14 6:59 ` Jason Merrill
2002-04-14 7:25 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-04-14 8:16 ` Jason Merrill
2002-04-15 10:56 ` Geoff Keating
2002-04-15 11:19 ` H . J . Lu
2002-04-16 15:16 ` mark
2002-04-16 15:23 ` H . J . Lu
2002-04-17 2:54 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-04-15 11:36 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-04-15 11:37 ` Joe Buck
2002-04-15 13:13 ` Geoff Keating
2002-04-15 12:00 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-04-15 12:01 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 12:13 ` Michael Matz
2002-04-15 12:22 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 14:52 ` Geoff Keating
2002-04-15 15:01 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-13 13:51 Robert Dewar
2002-04-14 10:34 Robert Dewar
2002-04-15 15:06 Richard Kenner
2002-05-05 11:37 Mark Mitchell
2002-05-05 15:00 ` Florian Weimer
2002-05-06 3:24 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-05-06 7:54 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-05-06 7:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-05-06 15:16 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-05-07 1:43 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020410101439.A1707@us.ibm.com \
--to=janis187@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).