From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26429 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2002 15:16:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26414 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2002 15:16:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Apr 2002 15:16:17 -0000 Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338) id 3B3C3F28C6; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 11:16:17 -0400 (EDT) To: hjl@lucon.org, toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Release Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com, neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk Message-Id: <20020414151617.3B3C3F28C6@nile.gnat.com> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 10:34:00 -0000 From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00571.txt.bz2 what we do with the GNAT releases, which has worked well is to issue a candidate release. Then we encourage all customers to try out this new release and report problems and regressions. We fix *ONLY* regressions, and *ONLY* if the fix is safe. We do not allow any other fixes into the final release which follows a few months later.