From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22632 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2002 07:31:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22609 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2002 07:31:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2002 07:31:43 -0000 Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Charybdis.suse.de [213.95.15.201]) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091111E841; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 09:31:39 +0200 (MEST) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 01:21:00 -0000 From: Andi Kleen To: Zack Weinberg Cc: Kevin Handy , Andi Kleen , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Message-ID: <20020415093138.A4975@wotan.suse.de> References: <20020412194555.GD320@codesourcery.com.suse.lists.egcs-patches> <3CBA0045.5090401@srv.net> <20020415062313.GC968@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020415062313.GC968@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00581.txt.bz2 On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 11:23:13PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 04:18:45PM -0600, Kevin Handy wrote: > > Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > >Here are some more proposals: > > > > > >pdp10-* > > > > > I wouldn't advise dropping the PDP10, since it is making a > > resurgance due to the emulators that have become available. I > > believe this target is actually fairly new. > > There isn't a PDP10 backend in the current official tree. I know > people are working on one, though. Andi, did you mean pdp11? Yes, pdp11, sorry. But as it seems there are people using it still it is probably better to keep it. -Andi