From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
To: ak@suse.de, kth@srv.net, mark@codesourcery.com, mrs@windriver.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, zack@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 13:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020415195906.E170BF28C4@nile.gnat.com> (raw)
I agree with Mike. One of the great strengths of gcc is the great variety
of supported targets, and the ease of porting to new targets. I think the
burden should be quite high for removing a target completely. It may of
course be the case that some ports are in less good shape, but so what?
next reply other threads:[~2002-04-15 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-15 13:03 Robert Dewar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-26 8:46 Dana, Eric
2002-04-26 9:18 ` Janis Johnson
2002-04-16 12:57 Dana, Eric
2002-04-16 8:46 Dana, Eric
2002-04-16 9:21 ` 'Zack Weinberg'
2002-04-16 9:39 ` Michael Matz
2002-04-15 9:28 Richard Kenner
2002-04-15 8:13 Robert Dewar
[not found] <20020412194555.GD320@codesourcery.com.suse.lists.egcs-patches>
2002-04-14 15:18 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-14 15:29 ` Kevin Handy
2002-04-14 23:24 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-15 1:21 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-15 6:35 ` Paul Koning
2002-04-15 7:46 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 8:07 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-15 8:16 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 12:59 ` mike stump
2002-04-15 13:23 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-16 2:37 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-16 22:40 ` David O'Brien
2002-04-15 10:45 ` Daniel Egger
2002-04-15 12:21 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 11:56 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 16:49 ` Richard Henderson
2002-04-15 8:20 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2002-04-15 8:33 ` Alan Lehotsky
2002-04-15 10:06 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-15 10:42 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 12:47 ` Janis Johnson
2002-04-25 16:56 ` Jason Merrill
2002-04-15 18:50 ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-16 9:39 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-16 9:59 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-04-18 9:29 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-04-18 10:13 ` Paul Koning
2002-04-19 12:36 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 12:50 ` mike stump
2002-04-15 19:31 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-15 19:46 ` DJ Delorie
2002-04-15 20:08 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-15 23:06 ` DJ Delorie
2002-04-16 7:01 ` Paul Koning
2002-04-15 23:24 ` Neil Booth
2002-04-16 6:08 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-17 18:13 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-17 19:10 ` DJ Delorie
2002-04-17 20:26 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-19 12:46 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 0:31 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-15 17:43 ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-15 17:07 ` David O'Brien
2002-04-16 0:44 ` Douglas B. Rupp
2002-04-16 4:32 ` Joel Sherrill
2002-04-16 7:08 ` Paul Koning
2002-04-16 7:22 ` Joel Sherrill
2002-04-16 3:41 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-04-16 6:30 ` Nick Burrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020415195906.E170BF28C4@nile.gnat.com \
--to=dewar@gnat.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kth@srv.net \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=mrs@windriver.com \
--cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).