From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13952 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2002 21:49:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13945 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2002 21:49:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pizda.ninka.net) (216.101.162.242) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2002 21:49:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA24517; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 14:40:51 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 14:51:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20020418.144050.39820645.davem@redhat.com> To: kukuk@suse.de Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020418221151.A29221@suse.de> References: <20020418221151.A29221@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00902.txt.bz2 From: Thorsten Kukuk Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 22:11:51 +0200 If I compile C++ programs with the latest gcc 3.1 snapshots on sparc32-linux, some programs fails with "Illegal instruction". This is reproduceable for me with groff, qt2 and qt3. Does anybody else see this? Can you put the program under GDB so we can see what the instruction is that it is trapping on? I'm not seeing this at all, but I only do testing on UltraSPARC boxes for the sparc32 targets...