From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11017 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2002 20:25:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11007 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2002 20:25:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw.j-son.org) (213.64.105.59) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2002 20:25:39 -0000 Received: from chj by fw.j-son.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16yITF-0005UJ-00 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 22:25:33 +0200 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:32:00 -0000 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux Message-ID: <20020418202532.GA20963@j-son.org> Mail-Followup-To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20020418221151.A29221@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020418221151.A29221@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Christian_J=F6nsson?= X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00897.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > > Hi, > > If I compile C++ programs with the latest gcc 3.1 snapshots on > sparc32-linux, some programs fails with "Illegal instruction". > > This is reproduceable for me with groff, qt2 and qt3. Does anybody > else see this? hmm, not I, might it be binutils related? /ChJ