From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-50471-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23407 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2002 23:59:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23388 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2002 23:59:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2002 23:59:54 -0000
Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3MNxOv17271;
	Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:59:24 -0700
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3MNxsR32545;
	Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:59:54 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:10:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Michel LESPINASSE <walken@zoy.org>
Cc: gcc list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GCC performance regression - its memset !
Message-ID: <20020422165953.A32536@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	Michel LESPINASSE <walken@zoy.org>, gcc list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20020421005718.GA16378@zoy.org> <20020422213222.GA21429@zoy.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20020422213222.GA21429@zoy.org>; from walken@zoy.org on Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 02:32:22PM -0700
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01123.txt.bz2

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 02:32:22PM -0700, Michel LESPINASSE wrote:
> OK, so I worked more to find the cause of the slowdown, and I figured
> out its all because of memset().

See whether or not disabling glibc's inline expansion of 
memset affects 2.95 vs 3.x with -D__NO_STRING_INLINES.


r~