From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-50528-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32572 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2002 16:45:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32314 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 16:44:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO devserv.devel.redhat.com) (66.187.233.200)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2002 16:44:56 -0000
Received: (from jakub@localhost)
	by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id g3NGiSY05834;
	Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:44:28 -0400
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:49:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease
Message-ID: <20020423124428.X23056@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <70140000.1019331966@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <20020420230627.P32482@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <1740000.1019348006@gandalf.codesourcery.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <1740000.1019348006@gandalf.codesourcery.com>; from mark@codesourcery.com on Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 05:13:26PM -0700
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01180.txt.bz2

On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 05:13:26PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > I'd say a blocker on SPARC shall be instead inoperability between
> > compiler defaulting to 64-bit and compiler defaulting to 32-bit
> > (the libgcc_s naming problem).
> 
> Submit a PR explaining the problem and send me a pointer to the PR.

target/6429
Though I'm afraid I won't have time for it until Thursday afternoon.
Should I mark it high priority?

	Jakub