From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1071 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2002 20:50:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1050 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 20:50:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2002 20:50:06 -0000 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3NKnXv21774; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:49:33 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3NKo5v00863; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:50:05 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:52:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Mark Mitchell Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Message-ID: <20020423135005.A860@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Mark Mitchell , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" References: <14800000.1019552485@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <20020423122254.A775@redhat.com> <29950000.1019593338@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <20020423132840.A823@redhat.com> <32140000.1019594105@gandalf.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <32140000.1019594105@gandalf.codesourcery.com>; from mark@codesourcery.com on Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 01:35:05PM -0700 X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01198.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 01:35:05PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > I meant in the unwinder to try to see what it thought it was doing. Oh, I see. Yes, one could verify that we did in fact find the frame we intended that way. > Are we already hosed at that point? I doubt it. r~