From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15777 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2002 22:08:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15770 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 22:08:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2002 22:08:41 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [205.180.230.59]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3NM88v22310; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:08:08 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3NM8eG22515; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:08:40 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:10:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Franz Sirl Cc: Alan Modra , Mark Mitchell , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Jason Merrill Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Message-ID: <20020423150840.B22500@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Franz Sirl , Alan Modra , Mark Mitchell , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Jason Merrill References: <5.1.1.2.2.20020423130143.04a21008@mail.lauterbach.com> <5.1.1.2.2.20020423190859.04dc6b88@mail.lauterbach.com> <20020423110433.A728@redhat.com> <200204240003.42142@enzo.bigblue.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200204240003.42142@enzo.bigblue.local>; from Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com on Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:03:42AM +0200 X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01205.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:03:42AM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote: > (declare_weak wasn't called for VAR_DECLs before) Huh? It must have been. > ... and judging from the comments in tree.h it looks like > TREE_ASM_WRITTEN has a slightly different meaning for a VAR_DECL. What makes you think that? > I don't think we want a warning here for strtod? I can make an argument either way. I'm inclined to warn, since older gcc would in fact render this into rtl right away, which has then already made decisions based on DECL_WEAK. r~