From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22871 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 13:58:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22829 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 13:58:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pizda.ninka.net) (216.101.162.242) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 13:58:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA30077; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 06:48:45 -0700 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20020424.064844.120470257.davem@redhat.com> To: kukuk@suse.de Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020419180943.A15551@suse.de> References: <20020419131012.B9225@suse.de> <20020419.084636.107134762.davem@redhat.com> <20020419180943.A15551@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01240.txt.bz2 Thorston, I believe we have discovered the cause of the problems. After I run some testsuites to check for regressions I will update the GNATs entry for this bug and post the patch. I will add you to the CC: of the GNATs PR so that you will know when 3.1 CVS has the fix installed. It turns out to be a generic sparc backend bug.