From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5461 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 02:52:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5450 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 02:52:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.wrs.com) (147.11.1.11) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 02:52:51 -0000 Received: from kankakee.wrs.com (kankakee [147.11.37.13]) by mail.wrs.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA11017 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:52:02 -0700 (PDT) From: mike stump Received: (from mrs@localhost) by kankakee.wrs.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.0) id TAA23291 for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:17:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200204240252.TAA23291@kankakee.wrs.com> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: sh le fp arg passing X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01223.txt.bz2 So, I have a question... Why do this: Excerpt from cvs log gcc/config/sh/sh.h: revision 1.23 date: 1998/11/23 08:50:40; author: amylaar; state: Exp; lines: +314 -73 Add SH4 support: ... (FUNCTION_ARG): Little endian adjustment for SH4 SFmode. Excerpt from cvs diff -u -r1.22 -r1.23 sh.h: @@ -883,7 +1039,9 @@ ((PASS_IN_REG_P ((CUM), (MODE), (TYPE)) \ && ((NAMED) || TARGET_SH3E || ! current_function_varargs)) \ ? gen_rtx (REG, (MODE), \ - (BASE_ARG_REG (MODE) + ROUND_REG ((CUM), (MODE)))) \ + ((BASE_ARG_REG (MODE) + ROUND_REG ((CUM), (MODE))) \ + ^ ((MODE) == SFmode && TARGET_SH4 \ + && TARGET_LITTLE_ENDIAN != 0))) \ : 0) is it compelling? Do we really want to do this? Why? Ignorant minds want to know!