From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21224 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 19:43:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21217 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 19:43:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 19:43:42 -0000 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3OJh7v26736; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:43:07 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3OJhgY01575; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:43:42 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:03:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Franz Sirl Cc: Jason Merrill , Alan Modra , Mark Mitchell , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Message-ID: <20020424124342.A1572@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Franz Sirl , Jason Merrill , Alan Modra , Mark Mitchell , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <5.1.1.2.2.20020423130143.04a21008@mail.lauterbach.com> <200204240003.42142@enzo.bigblue.local> <200204242101.39393@enzo.bigblue.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200204242101.39393@enzo.bigblue.local>; from Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com on Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:01:39PM +0200 X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01262.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:01:39PM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote: > Are we sure there is no code out there relying on these lonely .weak > statements? Was this change intended? Yes and yes. r~