From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29112 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 03:44:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29105 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2002 03:44:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2002 03:44:18 -0000 Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338) id 1822FF28C9; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 23:44:18 -0400 (EDT) To: dewar@gnat.com, willy@debian.org Subject: Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Cc: dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Message-Id: <20020425034418.1822FF28C9@nile.gnat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:27:00 -0000 From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01279.txt.bz2 > I think there's a misunderstanding. If GNAT simply uses standard > addresses from 0 to 2^32-1 there is no problem. If GNAT tries to take > advantage of PA's space register facilities to address more than 4GB > simultaneously, then it simply won't work under PA Linux. ok, well then you are saying that virtual indexing should always work on Linux, unlike HPUX, and it sounds like you are right :-)