From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16772 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 04:41:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16759 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2002 04:41:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca) (132.246.100.193) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2002 04:41:16 -0000 Received: from hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16) with ESMTP id g3P4fEFN021096; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 00:41:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dave@localhost) by hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16) id g3P4fEOY021094; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 00:41:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200204250441.g3P4fEOY021094@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Subject: Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS To: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:44:00 -0000 From: "John David Anglin" Cc: dewar@gnat.com, willy@debian.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020425032613.3C7BAF28D4@nile.gnat.com> from "Robert Dewar" at Apr 24, 2002 11:26:13 pm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01282.txt.bz2 > I see nothing in GNAT's use of virtual indexing that would guarantee > avoidance of sr 1, 2 or 3 in the base address (i.e. the address BEFORE > indexing). Perhaps you are right, but it would take careful analysis. The backend doesn't use sr1, sr2 or sr3. So, I don't see how they would ever get used. As long as the base address relates to a data symbol, and you are trying to access data, things should be ok. Dave -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)