From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18489 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 17:16:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18465 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2002 17:16:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2002 17:16:37 -0000 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3PHFfv31959; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:15:41 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3PHGIJ02346; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:16:18 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:33:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: David Edelsohn Cc: Bo Thorsen , bugs@x86-64.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Jan Hubicka Subject: Re: Exception handling problem on x86-64 Message-ID: <20020425101618.B2336@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , David Edelsohn , Bo Thorsen , bugs@x86-64.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Jan Hubicka References: <200204251707.NAA25352@makai.watson.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200204251707.NAA25352@makai.watson.ibm.com>; from dje@watson.ibm.com on Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 01:07:15PM -0400 X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01335.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 01:07:15PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > Is this possibly related to the exception unwinding bug affecting > Mips that Ed Maste reported in February? No. x86-64 does not have the same 32-bit value in 64-bit register problem. r~