From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3368 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2002 07:17:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3306 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2002 07:17:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.yifansoft.com) (64.61.26.50) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2002 07:17:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 29271 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2002 07:14:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Blackfoot) (169.229.102.51) by host6.yifansoft.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2002 07:14:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Jim Blomo To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Release Schedule Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200204260017.28142.Blackfoot@yifan.net> X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01384.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Would it be possible to update the development schedule to reflect the curr= ent=20 state of gcc? Like many people, I am interested in when planned releases a= re=20 going to take place. While I realise that these dates are not set in stone,= =20 it would be nice to know what the developers are aiming for without reading= =20 the mailing list. Specificly, http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#calendar cou= ld=20 use some updating, as 3.1 obviously has not been released yet. The followi= ng=20 release dates will probably need some adjustment too? Thanks for all the=20 hard work you put into the site and development. - --=20 Jim Blomo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjzI/wgACgkQUlS7JsvyVRI4LgCgsJQFYeVYmHASaLnekRPokTtN RSIAn3YlAMgSSAdY8pZVhljkVMeqMT2P =3DQXbX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----