From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-50812-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22250 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2002 21:06:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22242 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2002 21:06:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO e32.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.130)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2002 21:06:20 -0000
Received: from westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.194.24])
	by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3QL6I31075912;
	Fri, 26 Apr 2002 17:06:18 -0400
Received: from unknown.host (dyn9-47-17-178.des.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.17.178])
	by westrelay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO/VER6.1) with ESMTP id g3QL50U147600;
	Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:05:00 -0600
Received: (from janis@localhost)
	by unknown.host (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA32630;
	Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:05:06 -0700
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:16:00 -0000
From: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
To: Peter Schmid <schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Cc: janis187@us.ibm-com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin
Message-ID: <20020426140506.A21317@us.ibm.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0204262029430.28063-100000@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0204262029430.28063-100000@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>; from schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de on Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 08:37:04PM +0200
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01464.txt.bz2

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 08:37:04PM +0200, Peter Schmid wrote:
> I test pooma gcc on a regular basis. I did not encounter a problem since
> May 2001. But I am using the original pooma-gcc distribution
> with two patches of mine applied, otherwise configuring does not work.
> 
> Maybe applying the following patchset makes a difference:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-04/msg01020.html
> 
> Hope this helps, if not could you please post your log file.
> 
> Peter Schmid

Thanks, I applied that patch to pooma-gcc and it's chugging along now.

Gerald, how about this for gcc-3.1/testing-pooma.html?  The formatting
surrounding the patch code is highly questionable, so feel free to fix
it or tell me how to do it properly.

On the other hand, perhaps someone can rebuild the pooma-gcc tarball,
fixing this and also the copyright in testing.pl.

Janis

Index: testing-pooma.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-3.1/testing-pooma.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 testing-pooma.html
--- testing-pooma.html	18 Apr 2002 20:27:38 -0000	1.2
+++ testing-pooma.html	26 Apr 2002 20:59:39 -0000
@@ -28,6 +28,36 @@ programs, and run the examples, use:</p>
     <li><code>cd pooma-gcc</code></li>
     </ul>
 </li>
+<li>Apply this patch:
+    <ul>
+    <li><code>patch -b -p0 &lt;&lt; END_OF_PATCH
+        <pre>
+--- tester.pl.orig      Fri Apr 26 11:06:30 2002
++++ tester.pl   Fri Apr 26 11:06:57 2002
+@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ while (<VARIABLETEMPLATE>)
+ }
+ close (VARIABLES);
+ die ("Failed to finish writing the shared variables file.") if $?;
+-close (VARIABLE-TEMPLATE);
++close (VARIABLETEMPLATE);
+ die ("Failed to finish reading the shared variables template file.") if $?;
+
+ ######################################################################
+--- config/Shared/tail.mk.orig  Fri Apr 26 13:26:20 2002
++++ config/Shared/tail.mk       Fri Apr 26 13:25:57 2002
+@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ endif
+ include $(SHARED_ROOT)/rules.mk
+
+ # Include (if it exists) the dependency file.
+--include $(LIBRARY_ROOT)/depend.mk
++#-include $(LIBRARY_ROOT)/depend.mk
+
+
+ # ACL:rcsinfo
+END_OF_PATCH
+    </pre></code></li>
+    </ul>
+</li>
 </ul>