Re: make check errors with gcc-3.1

Re: make check errors with gcc-3.1

[Stephen L Moshier]

On Sun, 5 May 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 09:52:20PM -0400, Stephen L Moshier wrote:
> >
> >
> > Using gcc-3.1 from the current CVS branch, I am getting these errors
> > from make check on glibc-2.2.5.  There are no errors when building
> > with gcc-2.95.3.  The computer is an x86 AMD athlon.  Are these
> > legitimate, known, being worked on, ...?
> >
> > make[2]: *** [/e/b/arc/linux/glibc/build225/math/test-float.out] Error 1
> >
>
>
> > /e/b/arc/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.1/../../../../i486-linux/bin/ld:
> >    Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM value: 14.
>
>
> This one means that you need to use a newer binutils.


Can you say what version of binutils is required?
I think that ought to be documented in install.texi of gcc.
The one that was used above is version 2.11.90.0.27.

Re: make check errors with gcc-3.1

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 07:13:42AM -0400, Stephen L Moshier wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, 5 May 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 09:52:20PM -0400, Stephen L Moshier wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Using gcc-3.1 from the current CVS branch, I am getting these errors
> > > from make check on glibc-2.2.5.  There are no errors when building
> > > with gcc-2.95.3.  The computer is an x86 AMD athlon.  Are these
> > > legitimate, known, being worked on, ...?
> > >
> > > make[2]: *** [/e/b/arc/linux/glibc/build225/math/test-float.out] Error 1
> > >
> >
> >
> > > /e/b/arc/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.1/../../../../i486-linux/bin/ld:
> > >    Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM value: 14.
> >
> >
> > This one means that you need to use a newer binutils.
> 
> 
> Can you say what version of binutils is required?
> I think that ought to be documented in install.texi of gcc.
> The one that was used above is version 2.11.90.0.27.

I don't know the exact date; any 2.12* should be fine.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: make check errors with gcc-3.1

[Stephen L Moshier]

> > Can you say what version of binutils is required?
> > I think that ought to be documented in install.texi of gcc.
> > The one that was used above is version 2.11.90.0.27.
>
> I don't know the exact date; any 2.12* should be fine.

What about older versions of glibc?  Do you have to upgrade
the binutils in order to compile glibc-2.2.4 with gcc-3.1, for example?

Re: make check errors with gcc-3.1

[Craig Rodrigues]

> On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 07:13:42AM -0400, Stephen L Moshier wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > /e/b/arc/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.1/../../../../i486-linux/bin/ld:
> > > >    Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM value: 14.
> > >
> > >
> > > This one means that you need to use a newer binutils.
> > 
> > 
> > Can you say what version of binutils is required?
> > I think that ought to be documented in install.texi of gcc.
> > The one that was used above is version 2.11.90.0.27.


I brought this up on the gcc mailing list before:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-02/msg01071.html

I agree with you that adding this to the install documentation
would be useful.
-- 
Craig Rodrigues        
http://www.gis.net/~craigr    
rodrigc@attbi.com

Re: make check errors with gcc-3.1

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 10:50:02AM -0400, Stephen L Moshier wrote:
> 
> > > Can you say what version of binutils is required?
> > > I think that ought to be documented in install.texi of gcc.
> > > The one that was used above is version 2.11.90.0.27.
> >
> > I don't know the exact date; any 2.12* should be fine.
> 
> What about older versions of glibc?  Do you have to upgrade
> the binutils in order to compile glibc-2.2.4 with gcc-3.1, for example?

To compile anything with debugging information, in fact.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer