From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8845 invoked by alias); 6 May 2002 15:23:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8812 invoked from network); 6 May 2002 15:23:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 May 2002 15:23:02 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 174k5E-0004Wo-00; Mon, 06 May 2002 11:07:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 08:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Stephen L Moshier Cc: libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: make check errors with gcc-3.1 Message-ID: <20020506150724.GA17391@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Stephen L Moshier , libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20020506142610.GA15603@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00398.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 10:50:02AM -0400, Stephen L Moshier wrote: > > > > Can you say what version of binutils is required? > > > I think that ought to be documented in install.texi of gcc. > > > The one that was used above is version 2.11.90.0.27. > > > > I don't know the exact date; any 2.12* should be fine. > > What about older versions of glibc? Do you have to upgrade > the binutils in order to compile glibc-2.2.4 with gcc-3.1, for example? To compile anything with debugging information, in fact. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer