From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-52635-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27041 invoked by alias); 17 May 2002 23:35:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27034 invoked from network); 17 May 2002 23:35:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dragon.nuxi.com) (66.92.13.169)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 May 2002 23:35:03 -0000
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4HNZ2Jn004225;
	Fri, 17 May 2002 16:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g4HNZ18V004224;
	Fri, 17 May 2002 16:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:07:00 -0000
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To: Loren James Rittle <rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, espie@nerim.net
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Release
Message-ID: <20020517163500.A4119@dragon.nuxi.com>
Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org
References: <200204162351.g3GNpha21092@quatramaran.ens.fr> <20020517140210.A16176@tetto.liafa.jussieu.fr> <200205172204.g4HM4IvB044134@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200205172204.g4HM4IvB044134@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>; from rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com on Fri, May 17, 2002 at 05:04:18PM -0500
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg01563.txt.bz2

On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 05:04:18PM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote:
> >> FWIW, FreeBSD is adopting GCC 3.1 as system compiler for -CURRENT which
> >> will become FreeBSD 5.0 later this year.
...
> I have not personally tested it
> but perhaps David could post the exact time difference he saw when he
> made this change.

I really don't have any machines to compare with.  My own went from 2.95
to 3.1 in a peice meal fashion as I tested various things.  Sorry.