public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Espie <espie@nerim.net>
To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Loren James Rittle <rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Release
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020518013835.A26088@tetto.liafa.jussieu.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020517163500.A4119@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.org on Fri, May 17, 2002 at 04:35:00PM -0700

On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 04:35:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 05:04:18PM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote:
> > >> FWIW, FreeBSD is adopting GCC 3.1 as system compiler for -CURRENT which
> > >> will become FreeBSD 5.0 later this year.
> ...
> > I have not personally tested it
> > but perhaps David could post the exact time difference he saw when he
> > made this change.
> 
> I really don't have any machines to compare with.  My own went from 2.95
> to 3.1 in a peice meal fashion as I tested various things.  Sorry.

Well, unless you run tests, I will tend to assume you have the same
catastrophic behavior that I see.

Of course, since FreeBSD only targets fast architectures, this is less of
a problem...

For that matter, this is a mistake we've made once, between gcc 2.8 and
gcc 2.95 (which was already a slowdown), which is the reason why we are
much more careful when doing compiler upgrades now.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-17 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-12 18:51 Mark Mitchell
2002-04-13  2:21 ` Neil Booth
2002-04-13  7:50   ` Toon Moene
2002-04-13  8:40     ` Tim Prince
2002-04-13 23:07     ` Bryce McKinlay
2002-04-14 17:04       ` David Edelsohn
2002-04-15 17:19         ` David O'Brien
2002-04-15 18:02           ` David Edelsohn
2002-04-16 17:06           ` Marc Espie
2002-04-22 19:44       ` David O'Brien
2002-04-22 20:11         ` Bryce McKinlay
2002-04-23 11:04           ` David O'Brien
2002-04-23 16:15             ` Bryce McKinlay
2002-04-22 22:25         ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-04-14  1:33     ` H . J . Lu
2002-04-16 17:00     ` Marc Espie
2002-04-17  2:08       ` Gerald Pfeifer
2002-05-17  5:42         ` Marc Espie
2002-05-17 16:19           ` Loren James Rittle
2002-05-17 17:07             ` David O'Brien
2002-05-17 17:08               ` Marc Espie [this message]
2002-04-13 13:18 ` Tom Tromey
2002-04-14  6:59   ` Jason Merrill
2002-04-14  7:25     ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-04-14  8:16       ` Jason Merrill
2002-04-15 10:56     ` Geoff Keating
2002-04-15 11:19       ` H . J . Lu
2002-04-16 15:16         ` mark
2002-04-16 15:23           ` H . J . Lu
2002-04-17  2:54             ` Andreas Schwab
2002-04-15 11:36       ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-04-15 11:37         ` Joe Buck
2002-04-15 13:13         ` Geoff Keating
2002-04-15 12:00 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-04-15 12:01   ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 12:13     ` Michael Matz
2002-04-15 12:22       ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 14:52 ` Geoff Keating
2002-04-15 15:01   ` Mark Mitchell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-05 11:37 Mark Mitchell
2002-05-05 15:00 ` Florian Weimer
2002-05-06  3:24   ` Andreas Schwab
2002-05-06  7:54     ` Mark Mitchell
2002-05-06  7:57       ` Andreas Schwab
2002-05-06 15:16         ` Mark Mitchell
2002-05-07  1:43           ` Andreas Schwab
2002-04-15 15:06 Richard Kenner
2002-04-14 10:34 Robert Dewar
2002-04-13 13:51 Robert Dewar
2002-04-03 23:20 John David Anglin
2002-04-03  2:38 Reichelt
2002-04-03 13:21 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-02 14:38 Mark Mitchell
2002-04-02 14:47 ` Tom Tromey
2002-04-03 15:06 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-03 16:08   ` Joe Buck
2002-04-03 17:57     ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-04 10:17     ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-09  9:48       ` Joe Buck
2002-04-09 10:44         ` Benjamin Kosnik
2002-04-09 11:35         ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-10  2:37         ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-10  7:59           ` Joe Buck
2002-04-10  8:17             ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-10  8:22               ` Joe Buck
2002-04-10 10:14             ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-10 11:39               ` Benjamin Kosnik
2002-04-10 11:47                 ` Paolo Carlini
     [not found]                   ` <flwuvfqrme.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
2002-04-12  5:12                     ` Paolo Carlini
2002-04-10 13:01                       ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-11  6:02                         ` Joe Buck
2002-04-11 14:58                           ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-15 17:51               ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-15 19:36                 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-15 19:43                 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 20:03                   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-04-06  7:47 ` Jason Merrill
2002-04-10 10:17 ` Janis Johnson
2002-04-10 10:24   ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-10 10:35   ` Christian Jönsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020518013835.A26088@tetto.liafa.jussieu.fr \
    --to=espie@nerim.net \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=obrien@FreeBSD.org \
    --cc=rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).