From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15395 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2002 17:15:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15303 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2002 17:15:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pizda.ninka.net) (216.101.162.242) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2002 17:15:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA21117; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:12:06 -0700 Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 10:22:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20020604.101205.104719065.davem@redhat.com> To: rth@redhat.com Cc: pkoning@equallogic.com, levon@movementarian.org, ak@suse.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Speeding up GC From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020604101244.C14464@redhat.com> References: <15612.51512.39000.908725@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20020604.072448.55836404.davem@redhat.com> <20020604101244.C14464@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 From: Richard Henderson Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:12:44 -0700 You're looking at a different problem. One that needs solving, don't get me wrong, but rearranging how we scan or don't scan temporaries isn't going to help the problem described. Now I understand.