From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26218 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2002 22:12:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26187 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2002 22:12:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO igw3.watson.ibm.com) (198.81.209.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Jul 2002 22:12:30 -0000 Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57]) by igw3.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g65MCSU21522 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 18:12:28 -0400 Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (makai.watson.ibm.com [9.2.216.144]) by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g65MCSL39904 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 18:12:28 -0400 Received: from watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3/01-10-2000) with ESMTP id SAA21066 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 18:12:28 -0400 Message-Id: <200207052212.SAA21066@makai.watson.ibm.com> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? In-Reply-To: Message from Stan Shebs of "Fri, 05 Jul 2002 15:07:43 PDT." <3D2618AF.55F5047A@apple.com> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 16:12:00 -0000 From: David Edelsohn X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00249.txt.bz2 I thought that after GCC 3.1 was released, C++ bugs were suppose to be fixed in a backward-compatible way not requiring incompatible changes in the ABI, even if that required extra work. David