public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>,
	Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ?
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200207191454.KAA27500@makai.watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>  of "Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:51:59 EDT." <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207191051100.18232-100000@dberlin.org>

>>>>> Daniel Berlin writes:

>> Which begs the question: Is there a reason -fschedule-insns isn't on by
>> default when using -O2 ?

Daniel> Err, it is.

Daniel> if (optimize >= 2)

Daniel> flag_peephole2 = 1;
Daniel> #ifdef INSN_SCHEDULING
Daniel> flag_schedule_insns = 1;
Daniel> flag_schedule_insns_after_reload = 1;
Daniel> #endif

	Except i386.c turns it off:

void
optimization_options (level, size)
     int level;
     int size ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED;
{
  /* For -O2 and beyond, turn off -fschedule-insns by default.  It tends to
     make the problem with not enough registers even worse.  */
#ifdef INSN_SCHEDULING
  if (level > 1)
    flag_schedule_insns = 0;
#endif

David

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-19 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-16 14:10 Toon Moene
2002-07-19 11:00 ` Toon Moene
2002-07-19 11:02   ` Daniel Berlin
2002-07-19 11:03     ` David Edelsohn [this message]
2002-07-19 13:31   ` Richard Henderson
2002-07-20  2:13     ` Toon Moene
2002-07-20 11:42       ` Toon Moene
2002-07-20 12:05         ` Richard Henderson
2002-07-20 12:12           ` Richard Henderson
2002-07-21 10:01             ` Toon Moene
2002-07-21 14:23               ` Richard Henderson
2002-07-21 15:14                 ` Toon Moene
2002-07-21 22:41                 ` Toon Moene
2002-07-22  0:03                   ` Richard Henderson
2002-07-22 16:42                     ` Toon Moene
2002-07-23  2:12                       ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-08-12  7:49     ` Jeff Law
2002-08-12  7:53       ` Jan Hubicka
2002-08-12  9:56         ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200207191454.KAA27500@makai.watson.ibm.com \
    --to=dje@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).