From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 branch slowdown?
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 01:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200207202206.SAA23036@makai.watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> of "Sat, 20 Jul 2002 08:37:36 PDT." <20020720083735.A9127@lucon.org>
>>>>> H J Lu writes:
HJ> I noticed a slowdown on 3.1 branch between 0709 and 0711.
HJ> BTW, it is on Linux/i686. Has anyone else seen it?
While bootstrap may be slower, it does not necessarily mean that
the compiler is slower. Possibly the C++ correctness fixes are slowing
down compiling libstdc++?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-20 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-20 18:24 H. J. Lu
2002-07-21 1:04 ` David Edelsohn [this message]
2002-07-23 23:12 ` Loren James Rittle
2002-07-24 7:19 Loren James Rittle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200207202206.SAA23036@makai.watson.ibm.com \
--to=dje@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hjl@lucon.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).