From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-56830-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13058 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2002 22:06:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13049 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2002 22:06:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO igw3.watson.ibm.com) (198.81.209.18)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jul 2002 22:06:09 -0000
Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57])
	by igw3.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g6KM63C11000;
	Sat, 20 Jul 2002 18:06:03 -0400
Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (makai.watson.ibm.com [9.2.216.144])
	by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g6KM63H46356;
	Sat, 20 Jul 2002 18:06:03 -0400
Received: from watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3/01-10-2000) with ESMTP id SAA23036;
	Sat, 20 Jul 2002 18:06:01 -0400
Message-Id: <200207202206.SAA23036@makai.watson.ibm.com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 branch slowdown? 
In-Reply-To: Message from "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> 
   of "Sat, 20 Jul 2002 08:37:36 PDT." <20020720083735.A9127@lucon.org> 
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 01:04:00 -0000
From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00919.txt.bz2

>>>>> H J Lu writes:

HJ> I noticed a slowdown on 3.1 branch between 0709 and 0711.
HJ> BTW, it is on Linux/i686. Has anyone else seen it?

	While bootstrap may be slower, it does not necessarily mean that
the compiler is slower.  Possibly the C++ correctness fixes are slowing
down compiling libstdc++?

David