From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32720 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2002 13:04:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32713 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2002 13:04:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tornado.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2002 13:04:20 -0000 Received: (from dnovillo@localhost) by tornado.toronto.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6ND49A21523; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 09:04:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 11:26:00 -0000 From: Diego Novillo To: Fergus Henderson Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Message-ID: <20020723130409.GA21436@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> References: <20020722210212.GA16149@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> <20020723224639.A20890@hg.cs.mu.oz.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020723224639.A20890@hg.cs.mu.oz.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organization: Red Hat Canada X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg01103.txt.bz2 On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Fergus Henderson wrote: > It's easier for each front end to generate GENERIC than it is to > generate SIMPLE, because GENERIC is more expressive and has less > constraints than SIMPLE. > Thanks. That makes sense. Diego.