From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8127 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2002 20:30:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8115 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2002 20:30:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca) (132.246.100.193) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Jul 2002 20:30:20 -0000 Received: from hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16) with ESMTP id g6OKUI00018108; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 16:30:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dave@localhost) by hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16) id g6OKUH5e018106; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 16:30:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200207242030.g6OKUH5e018106@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Subject: Re: [fix] for: ra-colorize.c:1068: `inv_reg_alloc_order' undeclared To: matz@suse.de (Michael Matz) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 21:48:00 -0000 From: "John David Anglin" Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: from "Michael Matz" at Jul 24, 2002 10:14:33 pm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg01179.txt.bz2 > +/* I don't want to clutter up the actual code with ifdef's. */ > +#ifdef REG_ALLOC_ORDER > +#define inv_reg_alloc_order(c) inv_reg_alloc_order[c] > +#else > +#define inv_reg_alloc_order(c) c Should the above be #define inv_reg_alloc_order(c) FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER - 1 - (c) to obtain the inverse of lowest to highest ordering? Dave -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)