From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13916 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2002 04:48:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13909 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2002 04:48:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO newton.math.purdue.edu) (128.210.3.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2002 04:48:45 -0000 Received: from banach.math.purdue.edu (lucier@banach.math.purdue.edu [128.210.3.16]) by newton.math.purdue.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/PURDUE_MATH-4.0) with ESMTP id g6P4mhY26458; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 23:48:43 -0500 (EST) Received: (from lucier@localhost) by banach.math.purdue.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/PURDUE_MATH-4.0) id g6P4mgN00862; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 23:48:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 06:10:00 -0000 From: Brad Lucier Message-Id: <200207250448.g6P4mgN00862@banach.math.purdue.edu> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: curiosity about new-regalloc-branch Cc: lucier@math.purdue.edu X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg01196.txt.bz2 I noted that things are still being checked into the new-regalloc-branch, e.g., http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2002-07/msg00580.html and I'm curious---since the new register allocator has been integrated into the mainline, should these changes go into the mainline, too? Brad