From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14348 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2002 21:10:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14341 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2002 21:10:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2002 21:10:49 -0000 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6RLAqQ09598; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 14:10:52 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6RLAgk28129; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 14:10:42 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 18:50:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: John David Anglin Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, joern.rennecke@superh.com, lucier@math.purdue.edu Subject: Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Message-ID: <20020727141042.D28013@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , John David Anglin , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, joern.rennecke@superh.com, lucier@math.purdue.edu References: <200207261742.g6QHg6Nu011728@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200207261742.g6QHg6Nu011728@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>; from dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca on Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 01:42:06PM -0400 X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg01326.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 01:42:06PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > A similar error occurs on hppa-linux near the end of stage2: > > . > > The following patch appears to be the origin of the bootstrap failure > under hppa-linux: > > 2002-07-25 Richard Henderson > > * emit-rtl.c (set_mem_attributes): Fix size and alignment thinkos > in ARRAY_REF of DECL_P case. Surprising, to say the least, since I can only imagine problems _without_ that patch, as evidenced by the SH problems it fixed. If this is a stage2 failure, can you help me out by finding what bit of stage1 got miscompiled? r~