From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 383 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2002 22:03:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 375 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2002 22:03:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2002 22:03:03 -0000 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6RM3CQ09745; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 15:03:12 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6RM2x028159; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 15:02:59 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 00:08:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: Momchil Velikov , Alan Modra , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Undefined behavior in 950605-1.c Message-ID: <20020727150259.A28156@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Momchil Velikov , Alan Modra , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20020725105612.A27073@redhat.com> <200207260854.JAA14169@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200207260854.JAA14169@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>; from rearnsha@arm.com on Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 09:54:52AM +0100 X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg01329.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 09:54:52AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > PROMOTE_MODE has nothing to do with C types. It's for efficiency > > in the generated rtl *only*. > > I believe it can also be part of the ABI specification... This is true. I was sort of glossing over that to avoid confusion. r~