From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-57741-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15951 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2002 20:23:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15944 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2002 20:23:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO igw3.watson.ibm.com) (198.81.209.18)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Aug 2002 20:23:48 -0000
Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57])
	by igw3.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g75KNXC12064;
	Mon, 5 Aug 2002 16:23:33 -0400
Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (makai.watson.ibm.com [9.2.216.144])
	by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g75KNWH41468;
	Mon, 5 Aug 2002 16:23:32 -0400
Received: from watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3/01-10-2000) with ESMTP id QAA24440;
	Mon, 5 Aug 2002 16:23:30 -0400
Message-Id: <200208052023.QAA24440@makai.watson.ibm.com>
To: Geoff Keating <geoffk@redhat.com>
cc: per@bothner.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: needless deep recursion in gt-c-decl.h 
In-Reply-To: Message from Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> 
   of "Mon, 05 Aug 2002 12:08:03 PDT." <200208051908.g75J83T28477@desire.geoffk.org> 
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 13:23:00 -0000
From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00268.txt.bz2

>>>>> Geoff Keating writes:

>> I'm just concerned about slowing down gcc bit by bit.

Geoff> Annoying, but there seems little choice.

	Slowing down GCC by another 5% is not something that we should
just "live with".  This is hurting GCC's competitiveness.

David