From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Levon To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Faster compilation speed Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:30:00 -0000 Message-id: <20020811013043.GB21265@compsoc.man.ac.uk> References: <20020810212553.GA22959@chepelov.org> <20020811012851.GD23533@chepelov.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-08/msg00610.html On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 03:28:51AM +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > It would be very interesting to see how far off CG falls... CG does make the > implicit assumption that the process runs uninterrupted (I tried welding > cachegrind into UML, but that didn't bring me far). The real CPU will > certainly give you a more lively picture.... (the performance monitoring > counters are not per-process on Linux, are they ?) perfctr patch supports virtual counters (google first hit). I don't remember if it has P4 support yet. regards john -- "It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims." - Aristotle