public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <law@porcupine.slc.redhat.com>
To: "John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Building LyX 1.2.0 on HP-UX 11.11 with G++ 3.2
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208222219.g7MMJXm11922@porcupine.slc.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200208222208.g7MM8DYV007102@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>

 In message < 200208222208.g7MM8DYV007102@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca >, "John David 
Anglin" writes:
 >> Looks like they (HP) are using aborted code -- we tried to make SOM
 >> secondary definitions masquerade as weak symbols, but in the end it won't
 >> work due to limitations of secondary definitions.  Trust me, if they're
 >> emitting .weak for SOM, it's going to break -- it's just a matter of time.
 >
 >I thought the major issue was we weren't providing a primary symbol
 >definition for the secondary.  The primary symbol has to have the same
 >name as the secondary with '_' prefixed.  Maybe gas just needed a fix
 >to do this?
But the primary symbol had to be a normal symbol with the underscore 
prefix *and* with external scope.  The external scope restriction
is what killed using secondary definitions to emulate weak definitions.

jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-22 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-22 15:08 John David Anglin
2002-08-22 15:14 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2002-08-22 15:45   ` John David Anglin
2002-08-22 16:34     ` Jeff Law
2002-08-22 17:11       ` John David Anglin
2002-08-23  5:32       ` Albert Chin
2002-08-23 10:08         ` Jeff Law
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-22  5:31 Albert Chin
2002-08-22  9:29 ` Albert Chin
2002-08-22  9:34   ` John Levon
2002-08-22  9:48     ` Albert Chin
2002-08-22 12:12       ` Jeff Law
2002-08-22 12:15         ` Albert Chin
2002-08-22  9:40   ` Jeff Law
2002-08-22 11:02     ` Albert Chin
2002-08-22 12:02       ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200208222219.g7MMJXm11922@porcupine.slc.redhat.com \
    --to=law@porcupine.slc.redhat.com \
    --cc=dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).