From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@cambridge.redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
"gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: attribute "unpadded"
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 13:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020823200226.GG7880@daikokuya.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15718.36718.368014.869038@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Andrew Haley wrote:-
> Types with this new attribute will have unusual semantics - you can't
> have arrays of them nor take the addresses of objects with that type,
> for example.
I think you can take the address, you just can't do arithmetic on the
address if the underlying type is one of these unpadded types.
Neil.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-23 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-23 10:43 Mark Mitchell
2002-08-23 10:49 ` Andrew Haley
2002-08-23 10:50 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-23 12:39 ` Andrew Haley
2002-08-23 13:02 ` Neil Booth [this message]
2002-08-23 13:20 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-23 15:57 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-08-25 19:03 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-08-25 23:59 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-08-26 4:52 ` language-independent types (was: RFC: attribute "unpadded") Fergus Henderson
2002-08-23 16:42 ` RFC: attribute "unpadded" Olivier Galibert
2002-08-25 18:16 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-23 10:51 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-08-23 10:53 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-23 21:52 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-08-24 14:05 ` Paul Koning
2002-08-25 18:00 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-26 6:41 ` Paul Koning
2002-08-26 8:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-08-26 9:23 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-08-26 9:45 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-26 10:54 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-08-27 8:00 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-08-27 9:52 ` Tom Tromey
2002-08-27 10:46 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-27 11:39 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-08-27 12:01 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-27 12:04 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-08-27 14:25 ` Joe Buck
2002-08-29 15:12 ` Richard Henderson
2002-08-29 15:10 ` Richard Henderson
2002-08-29 15:24 ` Richard Henderson
2002-08-29 15:30 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-29 16:30 ` Richard Henderson
2002-08-29 15:29 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-29 15:45 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-08-29 16:00 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-29 16:06 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-08-29 16:32 ` Richard Henderson
2002-08-29 16:49 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-30 0:12 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-08-26 19:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-08-27 0:03 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-28 3:50 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-08-28 10:22 ` Joe Buck
2002-08-28 10:56 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-08-28 11:20 ` Joe Buck
2002-08-29 2:07 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-08-28 21:22 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-08-29 2:27 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-08-23 10:58 Benjamin Kosnik
2002-08-23 11:05 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-23 11:14 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2002-08-23 11:34 ` Janis Johnson
2002-08-23 11:39 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-23 11:35 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-08-23 12:03 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2002-08-23 16:07 Richard Kenner
2002-08-27 14:43 Richard Kenner
2002-08-27 20:25 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-08-28 4:12 Robert Dewar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020823200226.GG7880@daikokuya.co.uk \
--to=neil@daikokuya.co.uk \
--cc=aph@cambridge.redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).