From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Hubicka To: Jan Hubicka Cc: David Edelsohn , aj@suse.de, dewar@gnat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Ada and x86_64 Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:53:00 -0000 Message-id: <20020826195319.T24875@chimera.suse.cz> References: <20020826191440.P24875@chimera.suse.cz> <200208261720.NAA30744@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20020826192321.Q24875@chimera.suse.cz> X-SW-Source: 2002-08/msg01621.html On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 07:23:21PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 01:20:00PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > > >>>>> Jan Hubicka writes: > > > > Jan> I am trying to get Ada working on x86_64 architecture and I am running into > > Jan> interesting problems. > > > > Jan> First problem is use mov TImode divide that is not supported so results in > > Jan> libcall that is unresolved during building gnatchop. I've tracked this down > > Jan> into bitsizetype being TImode and using TImode arithmetic to compute size of > > Jan> the type. > > > > I thought that the TImode issue was mentioned in a previous > > discussion of Jim Wilson and Richard Kenner from a long time ago (2000?) > > because of GCC keeping track of bits. Some issue of TImode support in > > libgcc. > > Do you remember the thread? I will try to check it. > Does this mean that Ada is basically broken on any 64bit architecture not having TImode arithmetics? OK, I found it and I am just working on getting libgcc2 in TImode working on hammer. Thanks for the information. Honza > > Honza > > > > David