From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-59526-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1573 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2002 21:47:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1566 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2002 21:47:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Sep 2002 21:47:35 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id 1363EF2D4E; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 17:47:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: Peter.Sasi@t-systems.co.hu, aj@suse.de
Subject: Re: [GCC 3.x] Performance testing for QA
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Message-Id: <20020902214735.1363EF2D4E@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 14:47:00 -0000
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2

> Dear GCC people,
>
> Allow me the humble question to ask you if it would possible to
> employ a simple yet efficient testing method from real life as
> opposed to the SPEC* (artificial) test?


Interesting that someone should think that the gcc compiler is an
artificial test (it is one of the SPEC tests :-)