From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-59626-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4008 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2002 16:44:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4001 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2002 16:44:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Sep 2002 16:44:51 -0000
Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17mdGs-0002VR-00
	for gcc@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 12:44:50 -0400
Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17mdGq-0008VX-00
	for gcc@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 12:44:50 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([205.180.83.106])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17mdGq-0008VR-00
	for gcc@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 12:44:48 -0400
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26])
	by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g84GSDs14515;
	Wed, 4 Sep 2002 12:28:13 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g84GiCd04067;
	Wed, 4 Sep 2002 12:44:12 -0400
Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g84GiBl04713;
	Wed, 4 Sep 2002 09:44:11 -0700
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g84GiD609531;
	Wed, 4 Sep 2002 09:44:13 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 09:44:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Ricardo Anguiano <anguiano@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc@gnu.org, gcc-discuss@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: CATCH_ALL_TYPE?
Message-ID: <20020904164413.GC9505@redhat.com>
References: <m3ofbemqqu.fsf@mordack.codesourcery.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3ofbemqqu.fsf@mordack.codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,X_AUTH_WARNING,SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK,
	      UPPERCASE_25_50
	version=2.31
X-Spam-Level: 
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00136.txt.bz2

On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 07:29:45PM -0700, Ricardo Anguiano wrote:
> If CATCH_ALL_TYPE has gone away, what has taken it's place?

Presumably you mean in the context of catching exceptions?  NULL_TREE.


r~