* Website in XHTML @ 2002-09-17 12:59 Udo Steinbach 2002-09-17 13:30 ` Janis Johnson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Udo Steinbach @ 2002-09-17 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc Hi http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html has the XHTML 1.0 logo on it. But after a click on it the validator shows many errors. bye Udo Die fahrradfreundliche Stadt Oldenburg: http://radwege.udoline.de/ PGP: A245 F153 0636 6E34 E2F3 E1EB 817A B14D 3E7E 482E ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Website in XHTML 2002-09-17 12:59 Website in XHTML Udo Steinbach @ 2002-09-17 13:30 ` Janis Johnson 2002-09-19 23:44 ` Gerald Pfeifer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Janis Johnson @ 2002-09-17 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Udo Steinbach; +Cc: gcc On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:04:11PM +0200, Udo Steinbach wrote: > Hi > > http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html has the XHTML 1.0 logo on it. But after a click on it the validator shows many errors. > > bye > Udo Thanks for pointing that out so we can fix it. This file is generated from gcc/doc/install.texi, and the problems are in the generated XHTML commands. For those of you who understand what those tools are doing and what might be going wrong, or if the wrong version of the tools is being used, here are some of the problems with the generated html file: - end tag for "meta" omitted, or tag not ended with "/>" - some attribute values in meta tags are not quoted - no </p> and </li> tags are generated - an <hr> tag should be <hr /> Janis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Website in XHTML 2002-09-17 13:30 ` Janis Johnson @ 2002-09-19 23:44 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2002-09-20 11:10 ` Janis Johnson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2002-09-19 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Janis Johnson; +Cc: Udo Steinbach, gcc On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Janis Johnson wrote: > Thanks for pointing that out so we can fix it. > > This file is generated from gcc/doc/install.texi, and the problems are > in the generated XHTML commands. For those of you who understand what > those tools are doing and what might be going wrong, or if the wrong > version of the tools is being used, here are some of the problems with > the generated html file: > > - end tag for "meta" omitted, or tag not ended with "/>" > > - some attribute values in meta tags are not quoted > > - no </p> and </li> tags are generated > > - an <hr> tag should be <hr /> I'm out of office, and for security problems I cannot access gcc.gnu.org via SSH, but perhaps you could check whether the version of makeinfo on gcc.gnu.org is the most current one (the package is called texinfo, but the output of makeinfo --version is relevant here). If it's not up-to-date, please ask overseers@gcc.gnu.org to update, else it would be a good idea to contact the developers of makeinfo and report these problems. Thanks, Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Website in XHTML 2002-09-19 23:44 ` Gerald Pfeifer @ 2002-09-20 11:10 ` Janis Johnson 2002-09-20 12:38 ` Joe Buck 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Janis Johnson @ 2002-09-20 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: Janis Johnson, Udo Steinbach, gcc On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:14:25AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Janis Johnson wrote: > > Thanks for pointing that out so we can fix it. > > > > This file is generated from gcc/doc/install.texi, and the problems are > > in the generated XHTML commands. For those of you who understand what > > those tools are doing and what might be going wrong, or if the wrong > > version of the tools is being used, here are some of the problems with > > the generated html file: > > > > - end tag for "meta" omitted, or tag not ended with "/>" > > > > - some attribute values in meta tags are not quoted > > > > - no </p> and </li> tags are generated > > > > - an <hr> tag should be <hr /> > > I'm out of office, and for security problems I cannot access gcc.gnu.org > via SSH, but perhaps you could check whether the version of makeinfo on > gcc.gnu.org is the most current one (the package is called texinfo, but > the output of makeinfo --version is relevant here). > > If it's not up-to-date, please ask overseers@gcc.gnu.org to update, else > it would be a good idea to contact the developers of makeinfo and report > these problems. When I run doc/texi2html using makeinfo version 4.2 I get the same problems that are listed above. The texinfo documentation says "The HTML generated is mostly standard (i.e., HTML 2.0, RFC-1866)." It looks like we should use different headers for html files generated by makeinfo, and don't include the compliance claim in the footer. Janis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Website in XHTML 2002-09-20 11:10 ` Janis Johnson @ 2002-09-20 12:38 ` Joe Buck 2002-10-04 4:58 ` Gerald Pfeifer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Joe Buck @ 2002-09-20 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Janis Johnson; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer, Janis Johnson, Udo Steinbach, gcc > The texinfo documentation says "The HTML generated is mostly standard > (i.e., HTML 2.0, RFC-1866)." It looks like we should use different > headers for html files generated by makeinfo, and don't include the > compliance claim in the footer. Omitting </p> and generating <hr> instead of <hr /> is valid HTML 2.0. If we want to be XHTML-compliant, we'd need to get texinfo fixed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Website in XHTML 2002-09-20 12:38 ` Joe Buck @ 2002-10-04 4:58 ` Gerald Pfeifer 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2002-10-04 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Buck; +Cc: Janis Johnson, Udo Steinbach, gcc On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Joe Buck wrote: > Omitting </p> and generating <hr> instead of <hr /> is valid HTML 2.0. > If we want to be XHTML-compliant, we'd need to get texinfo fixed. Yes, and Janis already contacted the makeinfo maintainers with a very nice "bug" report/feature request. In the meantime, I'm going to hack our scripts to avoid claiming XHTML 1.0 compliance for /install. Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-04 8:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-09-17 12:59 Website in XHTML Udo Steinbach 2002-09-17 13:30 ` Janis Johnson 2002-09-19 23:44 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2002-09-20 11:10 ` Janis Johnson 2002-09-20 12:38 ` Joe Buck 2002-10-04 4:58 ` Gerald Pfeifer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).