From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path:
Received: (qmail 6423 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2002 18:13:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6413 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2002 18:13:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164)
by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2002 18:13:29 -0000
Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
id 17sSHR-0007R1-00
for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:13:29 -0400
Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
id 17sSHP-0004bJ-00
for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:13:28 -0400
Received: from boden.synopsys.com ([204.176.20.19])
by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
id 17sSHO-0004am-00
for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:13:26 -0400
Received: from mother.synopsys.com (mother.synopsys.com [146.225.100.171])
by boden.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 12648DC70; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atrus.synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mother.synopsys.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA23588;
Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joe Buck
Received: (from jbuck@localhost)
by atrus.synopsys.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) id LAA17387;
Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200209201813.LAA17387@atrus.synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: Website in XHTML
To: janis187@us.ibm.com (Janis Johnson)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:38:00 -0000
Cc: pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Gerald Pfeifer),
janis187@us.ibm.com (Janis Johnson),
udo.steinbach@ewetel.net (Udo Steinbach), gcc@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20020920110557.A1441@us.ibm.com> from "Janis Johnson" at Sep 20, 2002 11:05:57 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,DOUBLE_CAPSWORD
version=2.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00821.txt.bz2
> The texinfo documentation says "The HTML generated is mostly standard
> (i.e., HTML 2.0, RFC-1866)." It looks like we should use different
> headers for html files generated by makeinfo, and don't include the
> compliance claim in the footer.
Omitting
and generating
instead of
is valid HTML 2.0.
If we want to be XHTML-compliant, we'd need to get texinfo fixed.