From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31158 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2002 23:55:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31151 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2002 23:55:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO egil.codesourcery.com) (66.92.14.122) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2002 23:55:35 -0000 Received: from zack by egil.codesourcery.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17vROC-0007m9-00; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:52:48 -0700 Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:06:00 -0000 To: Bruce Korb Cc: tprince@computer.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Automake Development Subject: Re: module level flags Message-ID: <20020928235248.GA1288@codesourcery.com> References: <3D9635BA.5DC3F94F@pacbell.net> <20020928231730.6464C2CABC@inet1.ywave.com> <3D963F4D.73F799D5@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D963F4D.73F799D5@pacbell.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Zack Weinberg X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg01178.txt.bz2 On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 04:46:21PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: > > For the time being, I'll test for GCC 3.[12] and disable > optimization for that compiler, I guess. :-( If you've found an optimizer bug in 3.[12] not present in 3.0 and prior, you could have the courtesy to *tell us what it is* so we can *fix* it. zw