From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-60675-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26095 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2002 09:41:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26088 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2002 09:41:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2002 09:41:32 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id 3E262F2D68; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 05:41:32 -0400 (EDT)
To: bkorb@pacbell.net, zack@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: module level flags
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Message-Id: <20020929094132.3E262F2D68@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 06:40:00 -0000
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg01185.txt.bz2

<<Any other interpretation is too confusing to be able to remember.
In other words, wrong.
>>

Can you justify this position from the standard?