From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-60707-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13989 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2002 20:38:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13965 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2002 20:38:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2002 20:38:40 -0000
Received: by nile.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 338)
	id 16208F2D6A; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 16:38:40 -0400 (EDT)
To: bkorb@pacbell.net, dewar@gnat.com
Subject: Re: module level flags
Cc: drow@mvista.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@integrable-solutions.net,
	zack@codesourcery.com
Message-Id: <20020929203840.16208F2D6A@nile.gnat.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:42:00 -0000
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg01217.txt.bz2

By the way it certainly seems that YACC is incorrect here in its approach,
and at the very least should discuss the implications
of its choice for YYSTYPE.