* Re: g++ "loosing" options
@ 2002-10-01 17:40 Nathan .
2002-10-01 21:28 ` Phil Edwards
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nathan . @ 2002-10-01 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dj; +Cc: gcc
so does that mean the application still does not loose the multithreaded
capability. would there be any problems calling thread apis.
-Thanks
Nathan
>From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
>To: snmptoddler@hotmail.com
>CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>Subject: Re: g++ "loosing" options
>Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 19:48:49 -0400
>
> > /usr/local/bin/g++ ... -mt ...
>
> > cc1plus: Invalid option `t'
>
>It's the "-mt" option. -m* options are always passed to the compiler
>pass, which then strips the -m part.
_________________________________________________________________
Join the worldÂ’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: g++ "loosing" options
2002-10-01 17:40 g++ "loosing" options Nathan .
@ 2002-10-01 21:28 ` Phil Edwards
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Phil Edwards @ 2002-10-01 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan .; +Cc: dj, gcc
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:31:20AM +0000, Nathan . wrote:
> so does that mean the application still does not loose the multithreaded
> capability. would there be any problems calling thread apis.
GCC doesn't /have/ an -mt option. Perhaps you are thinking of Sun's
compiler?
For the spelling of threading-related options, please see the manual.
--
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
- Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: g++ "loosing" options
2002-10-01 17:31 snmp toddler
@ 2002-10-01 17:38 ` DJ Delorie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2002-10-01 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: snmptoddler; +Cc: gcc
> /usr/local/bin/g++ ... -mt ...
> cc1plus: Invalid option `t'
It's the "-mt" option. -m* options are always passed to the compiler
pass, which then strips the -m part.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* g++ "loosing" options
@ 2002-10-01 17:31 snmp toddler
2002-10-01 17:38 ` DJ Delorie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: snmp toddler @ 2002-10-01 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Hello All,
I am trying to compile an existing code(compiles well with Forte C++)
with g++. I am getting the following errors.
I could not find any 't' option in either Makefile or elsewhere.
Please advise.
-----Compilation errors-----
/usr/local/bin/g++ -w -mt -I. -I/home/dama/Andreas/Library/util
-I/home/dama/Andreas/Library/xobj/ -I/home/dama/Andreas/Library/compat
-I/usr/dt/include -I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/lib/sparcv9 -Dsun -DDAMANMS
-DGUI -D_REENTRANT -DNO_CAST -D__ORIGINAL_XORG_CODE -DMULTITHREAD_DATABASE
-DMULTITHREAD_CDR -DMULTITHREAD_LOGFILE -DMULTITHREAD_DOWNLOAD -c
addmodemwin.cc
cc1plus: Invalid option `t'
*** Error code 1
-Thanks
Nathan
_________________________________________________________________
Join the worldÂ’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-02 0:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-01 17:40 g++ "loosing" options Nathan .
2002-10-01 21:28 ` Phil Edwards
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-01 17:31 snmp toddler
2002-10-01 17:38 ` DJ Delorie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).