From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11181 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2002 17:47:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11173 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2002 17:47:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2002 17:47:58 -0000 Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17xA4s-0002N5-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 13:47:58 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17xA4o-00077i-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 13:47:57 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17xA4o-00077V-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 13:47:54 -0400 Received: from westrelay05.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.193.33]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g93HllOF077004; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:47:47 -0400 Received: from dyn9-47-17-68.beaverton.ibm.com (dyn9-47-17-68.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.17.68]) by westrelay05.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.4) with ESMTP id g93Hlv9v100156; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:47:58 -0600 Received: (from janis@localhost) by dyn9-47-17-68.beaverton.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA26540; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:49:30 -0700 Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:35:00 -0000 From: Janis Johnson To: vargenau@free.fr Cc: gcc@gnu.org Subject: Re: http://gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: <20021003104930.A2009@us.ibm.com> References: <1033653296.3d9c4c3086478@imp.free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1033653296.3d9c4c3086478@imp.free.fr>; from vargenau@free.fr on Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:54:56PM +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS version=2.31 X-Spam-Level: X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00169.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:54:56PM +0200, vargenau@free.fr wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for maintaining the GCC web pages. > I like the fact that you put a button on the pages so that it > is easy the check the correctness of the HTML code. > > Many of your pages are correct, unfortunately, some are not. > For exemple: http://gcc.gnu.org/libstdc++/ > > I used > http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/ > to recursively check your web site. Thank you for the information. I wasn't aware of that site, although we regularly use http://validator.w3.org for individual files. The GCC web pages that are generated by Texinfo 4.2 do not conform to XHTML 1.0 Transitional as the pages claim. The web page maintainers are discussing how to handle this. Janis Johnson