From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-61052-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 895 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2002 18:10:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 888 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2002 18:10:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Oct 2002 18:10:10 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26])
	by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g94I9ts27611;
	Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:09:55 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g94IA8l29987;
	Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:10:09 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g94IA8w09458;
	Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:10:08 -0700
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g94IA3l16266;
	Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:10:03 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 11:30:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
Cc: mrs@apple.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: deprecate i960 now?
Message-ID: <20021004181003.GA16257@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>, mrs@apple.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
References: <20021004114941.2BBABF2DAF@nile.gnat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021004114941.2BBABF2DAF@nile.gnat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:49:41AM -0400, Robert Dewar wrote:
> This is definitely false, there are live projects using this chip, which
> expect to be supported for a very long time, and Intel is still definitely
> manufacturing these chips.

All of which does not affect the fact that we have no maintainer.


r~